‘The King’s Speech’ (without Nachos)

Colin Firth during the filming of ‘The King’s Speech’ shown near to a portrait of the real life George VI, the man whose part he plays in the film.


When you go in to see a film with the prior knowledge that it has won all kinds of awards and got critical acclaim it can sometimes make it seem a bit of a let down. The King’s Speech has won the awards and got the acclaim but it’s no let down. I suppose if you only like films with 13 car chases in the first half hour, masses of 3D CGI and someone who used to be a rapper then you might be disappointed.

We went to see it last night at Runcorn Cineworld and got off to a terrible start when the trailers and adverts played with sound only and without anything appearing on screen (or maybe that was actually a better start!). No-one in the auditorium seemed to want to go and tell the staff about the fault so I had to go and do it (if I hadn’t would we all have sat and listened to a 2-hour film without any actual image on screen?! Us Brits really don’t like to make a fuss, you know). A nervous young Cineworld employee came in and had his own King’s Speech moment when he had to anounce to us all that there was a problem with the new projectors and that they were trying to sort it out. A couple of minutes later images appeared on screen and the new projectors proved to be worth the wait because the picture was the clearest I’ve ever seen. Nobody cares about that kind of technical stuff, I know, but I do so there (if I watch a film it has to be in exactly the right screen ratio, focussed to perfection and without even a hair off the head of the person in front getting in the way. That’s without even mentioning the issue of Nacho eaters!! Anyway… I digress).

The film tells the story of King George VI of Britain, his impromptu ascension to the throne and the speech therapist who helped the unsure monarch become worthy of that position. The subject matter has the potential to result in a dry, creaky old period drama but that isn’t what I saw. I think this may be one of the best films I’ve ever seen. The script by David Seidler is touching and funny, the direction by Tom Hooper is subtle but emotional, and the quality of the acting is overwhelming.

I’ve never been a big fan of Colin Firth but his performance in this film has made me change my mind completely. He is absolutely brilliant in his portrayal of the King and makes us feel the agony the character is going through. Geoffrey Rush as Logue, the speech therapist, is also breathtaking. The whole story is really a two-hander between these two fascinating characters. The most effective parts of the movie are when these two are on screen culminating in a superb climax when Logue supports Bertie through the ordeal of the speech to the nation at the outbreak of the Second World War.

The story held a lot of poignancy for me because I’ve had a similar problem with public speaking my whole life. I don’t have a stammer but I’ve always found it nearly impossible to speak in front of more than three or four people without feeling like the breath has left my lungs and going into a panic attack. I think part of why I write this blog is because its a way of communicating without having to actually speak in front of people. Seeing the scene in the film where Bertie walks towards the room where he will have to give the big speech I found harrowing. But also brilliant, touching and uplifting.

Some people say that stage plays (this film was adapted from the stage) don’t often make good cinema. They’re wrong in this case at least. Yes, the scenes are long and mostly consist of people talking in interiors. But the strength of feeling created by the acting, writing and direction was more than enough to keep me totally gripped for every second. I love films but I rarely come out of the cinema feeling as touched, as inspired and as impressed as I did after this one. I didn’t even notice the Nachos.

The real King George VI, played by Colin Firth in the film, just after he gave the speech of his life at the outbreak of the Second World War.

4 thoughts on “‘The King’s Speech’ (without Nachos)

  1. Stephen King made a point in one of his books that some people can tell a great story to an audience and some people can put a great story on the page, but people who possess both skills are very rare. Which maybe says something about why I blog, too.
    It was a great film, despite the fiddlings with history. Some critics have pointed out that Churchill was anything but a supporter of George VI – where I thought it was weak myself was on Edward VIII’s Nazi sympathies.


  2. Yes you are right about the lack of much of a mention of Edward VIII’s Nazi sympathies. I suppose we might have said that it wasn’t really part of the focus of the film but that doesn’t really hold water because the rise of Hitler and the start of the War is an integral part of the film. So to not even mention Bertie’s brother’s view of the Nazis seems odd. The only possible defence I can think of is that Edward’s Nazi sympathies is a big topic to tackle and couldn’t be done justice to in this film without detracting from the main storyline; Bertie’s struggle with himself. I dunno; I don’t really buy that. I think they probably didn’t want to make the film too controversial as they were portraying both the father and the Uncle of our present Queen. Pity really. Maybe there’s another film to be made about Edward and his dalliance with Hitler. Maybe you and I should write it!


  3. As you well know Jon, I have some experience writing for der Fuhrer.
    Seriously though, the scene where Bertie is watching Hitler on the newsreel was for me the most intriguing moment of the film. The forces of evil, represented by a fast-talking pos, and the forces of good by a king who can barely say good morning without tripping over it. The look on Colin Firth’s face: was he envious of Hitler’s skill? Terrified by it? Both of them and something else besides, maybe.
    ALSO! I heard an item on the radio this am about an exhibition
    at His Majesty’s Theatre in Perth devoted to Lionel Logue. Logue was quite a prominent figure in Perth’s theatre scene before he moved to the UK.
    There’s a link to the radio piece there.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s